By Phuoc Buu
VietNamNet Bridge-Oct 25
The sinking situation of the Cuu Long (Mekong) Delta in the south of Vietnam—seen in the rising tides and worsening floods affecting the region—is obviously caused by climate change. But the mindset of planners that fostered the building of embankment systems around the delta decades ago has worsened today’s situation.
The mindset persists today, as experts have recommended the clearance of these embankment systems, but planners for the delta development insisted on protecting the embankments for shortsighted benefits.
The impacts of climate change have recently become clearer than ever before in the delta as rising sea levels and higher tides have become more frequent. Late last week, the delta’s biggest urban center, Can Tho City, was flooded to the historic tidal level.
The tidal level measured on the Hau River, one of the two biggest branches of the Mekong River in Vietnam, was 2.23m, much higher than the peak tide of 2.15m recorded in 2011 and the highest level in 40 years. The tidal flooding heavily impacted city dwellers, but also destroyed crops in its rural areas.
Several days later, floodwaters engulfed Can Tho, Hau Giang, Vinh Long, Dong Thap and An Giang provinces, breaking many sections of the embankment to enter residential as well as farming areas. The water destroyed or damaged more than 6,800ha of rice, vegetables and fruit trees. It also blocked around 90km of road in the delta and kept millions of students home from the flooded schools.
Experts predicted this scenario several years ago and warned planners in the delta, but it seems no one listened to them. Embankment systems surrounding the residential and farming areas have yielded short-term benefits while guaranteeing critical destruction would unfold.
Decades ago, authorities in the delta provinces allowed the building of earthen embankment systems in many places in the delta. By the early 2010s, almost the entire delta area was embedded with the embankments.
The embankments prevented annual floodwater from the upper Mekong River entering the residential and paddy field areas, which yielded higher production of rice as well as fruits.
Without the embankments, delta farmers were unable to farm the third crop in a year due to flooding. The embankments helped the country stay strong in its competition with Thailand to be the world’s top rice producer.
But reduced flows of floodwater in and out of the fields meant no alluvia deposits. And there were no floodwaters to clear the chemical residues left by treatments to kill pests and prevent plant diseases.
As a result, the soil has become poorer and pests and diseases have grown in number, driving the overuse of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. The country’s rice cannot compete with Thai rice in quality. Local rice is not favoured due to the fear of chemical residue.
The damage wrought by the embankments has become much clearer in the context of climate change as seen in the current situation of the delta. The delta’s earthen embankments work like a circling fort for water: it ensures no entrance of water during normal times, but it also prevents water from receding from the inside of an embankment system.
Once water breaks a section of the embankment to reach the interior, which is usually a wide rice paddy or a residential area with lots of orchards, it will remain in that area much longer.
For years, experts working on climate change impact studies have warned authorities in the delta as well as the urban and agricultural planners around the country that the only way to cope with climate change is to adapt to the impacts.
Adaptation to climate change in the delta includes the demolition of embankments as well as concrete dykes built to block the in-flow of floodwater, particularly in the inland wetland zones as the natural reservoirs receive and reserve floodwater from the Mekong.
Since 2010, the experts dedicated to the delta, including Dr Duong Van Ni, Dr Le Anh Tuan and Dr Nguyen Huu Thien, had voiced their concern over the rampant development of the embankments and dykes in almost every province in the delta.
According to Dr Tuan, floodwater from the Mekong was blocked from accessing the natural reservoirs of Plain of Reeds and Long Xuyen Quadrangle, thanks to their flood-blocking dykes, so it was understandable that water would flock to the lowland area like Can Tho City.
The impacts seem to be doubling as tidal rise and water flows from the upper provinces have occurred at the same time in the lowland areas.
Unfortunately, experts’ warnings could not budge the conviction of provincial authorities and agriculture planners that dykes should be built—at any cost. Now the Mekong Delta and its people are paying the true price.
